Home›Model comparison

Choose an AI model for coding agents in 2026

Compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash by failure cost, context, multimodal input, API economics and benchmark evidence.

Independent editorial review: DeepSeekDSHSource checked: 0.1.5-rc.2 · 2026-09-11

On this page

Do not start with a universal leaderboard

Pick the cheapest model that meets the task's reliability, input-format and tool requirements. Escalate when the cost of failure or review justifies the upgrade. Public benchmarks help only when the model version, benchmark revision, harness and reasoning effort are explicit.

Choose by the cost of failure and the task's input data

Large volumes of verifiable work

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Start here when raw token cost dominates and tests or structured checks can catch bad output cheaply.

High-cost failures and difficult execution

GPT-6 Astra

Choose a frontier model when failed attempts, recovery or senior review cost more than the API premium.

Long-running sessions with repeated context

Claude Fable 5.1

Consider it when long-horizon agent work and low cache-read pricing matter more than the cheapest base input rate.

Audio, video, PDF and code in one pipeline

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Use it when native multimodal input and high-volume economics both matter in the same workflow.

Production routing usually beats a single-model policy

Send cheap, verifiable work to a low-cost tier. Escalate after a bounded number of test failures, repeated tool errors or low-confidence evidence, or when a task carries high human-review costs.

September 2026 specification and price snapshot

Use the table as a routing constraint, not a ranking. DeepSeek shows peak pricing below and also offers half-price off-peak rates. Gemini's $0.75/$3.75 rates are promotional through the end of 2026; its listed regular rates are $1.50/$7.50. Astra has a separate long-context pricing rule above 272K input tokens.

Model	Context	Max output	Input / 1M	Output / 1M	Evidence boundary
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	1M	384K	$0.30 peak	$1.20 peak	Official launch evidence is strong; same-version independent evidence is still developing
GPT-6 Astra	1.05M	128K	$10	$50	Current independent frontier evidence is available; results still depend on harness and effort
Claude Fable 5.1	1M	128K	$10	$50	Independent frontier comparisons plus explicit long-running agent positioning
Gemini 3.8 Flash	1M	64K	$0.75 2026 promo	$3.75 2026 promo	Provider coding evidence plus independent comparisons; index versions must be kept separate

Keep every score attached to its test contract

Use official model pages for context, modalities, output limits and provider pricing.
Label provider-run benchmarks as provider evidence instead of presenting them as independent rankings.
Compare independent scores only when the exact model version, benchmark revision, harness and reasoning effort are known.
Do not reuse DeepSeek V4 Pro scores as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores. DeepSeek says V4.1 Flash surpasses V4 Pro, but that does not create a same-version third-party number.
Track retries, tool loops and human review alongside token spend. Raw price is not accepted-task cost.

Open the analysis that matches the decision

Primary and independent sources

Prices, aliases and evaluation methods change. Recheck the provider pages before a large production commitment.

DeepSeek API — Models & Pricing · OpenAI API — GPT-6 Astra · Claude Platform — Claude Fable 5.1 · Google DeepMind — Gemini 3.8 Flash model card · Artificial Analysis — current model comparisons